Estate of Bird

225 Cal. App. 2D 196 (1964)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Bird

California Court of Appeal
225 Cal. App. 2D 196 (1964)

Facts

Spouses Jeannette and Geoffrey Bird simultaneously executed wills in February 1961. Jeannette died in June 1961. Her will created a trust for her assets, stating that the trust would terminate upon Geoffrey’s death. The will gave Geoffrey a general testamentary power of appointment, meaning that he had the exclusive power to dispose of the trust’s assets upon his death via his will. Geoffrey died just three months after Jeannette. His will devised his assets, including the trust property, to Citizens National Bank (Citizens) (defendant) in trust for the benefit of his children. The net income was to be distributed between the children in equal shares for life. Upon the death of the last child and any grandchildren living at the time of Geoffrey’s death, the trust was to terminate, and the assets were to be distributed among the children of Geoffrey’s grandchildren. During the probate of Geoffrey’s will, a dispute arose between Lois Tiffany (plaintiff) and Citizens, which was the estate’s executor. After the probate court entered a decree determining the parties’ respective interests in the estate, Citizens appealed, seeking clarification regarding application of the rule against perpetuities.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership