Estate of Cartwright v. Commissioner

183 F.3d 1034 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Cartwright v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
183 F.3d 1034 (1999)

Facts

Robert Cartwright was a shareholder at law firm Cartwright, Slobodin, Bokelman, Borowsky, Wartnick, Moore & Harris, Inc. (CSB). CSB compensated its attorneys, including Cartwright, with an annual salary and annual bonuses that were based on profits. CSB had a shareholder’s agreement that provided for payments to a deceased shareholder’s successors for the deceased shareholder’s stocks and various earnings and profits. In 1988, CSB amended the shareholder’s agreement as to how it applied upon Cartwright’s death, specifying that the firm would purchase life-insurance policies with a value of $5,000,000, which would be used to pay Cartwright’s estate (plaintiff) for his outstanding stocks and his claims “to any cases or work in process that may otherwise be made on behalf of Robert E. Cartwright.” Cartwright died on June 30, 1988, and CSB paid a total of $5,062,029 to Cartwright’s estate (plaintiff). The estate filed an income tax return for the estate but omitted the entire amount received from CSB. CSB had reported $4,080,256 to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) as compensation, and the IRS found the estate to be deficient on taxes based on that amount. Cartwright’s estate appealed to the United States Tax Court and argued that the entire amount received from CSB was a payment made to redeem Cartwright’s stocks. Based on the amendment to the shareholder’s agreement, which contemplated payment for both stocks and Cartwright’s claims to firm income, the tax court held that the portion of the payment made for Cartwright’s claims to income was income in respect of a decedent and must be taxed to the estate as such. The tax court calculated the amount of the payment that was taxable based on various factual matters. Cartwright’s estate appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Silverman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership