From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Estate of Clark
California Court of Appeal
271 P. 542 (1928)
Facts
Major Dillard Clark had three children from his first marriage, including two who survived him, Dillard H. Clark, Jr. and Alice Clark Myers (plaintiffs). Major Clark's son Edwin Howard Clark predeceased him, testate, in July 1923. Major Clark contested the will as invalid in litigation. The case was ultimately settled by an agreement in which Major Clark received a one-half interest in Edwin's estate, which included an interest in oil-producing wells. In August 1923, Major Clark entered into his second marriage with Eliza Simpson Clark (defendant). In February 1926, Major Clark passed away, leaving a will that set up a trust fund for Eliza, providing her with income from approximately $40,000 worth of securities, while leaving most of his property to his surviving children. Eliza waived her rights under Major Clark's will and elected to take her spousal share. Dillard and Alice petitioned the trial court to distribute according to the terms of the will. The trial court distributed Major Clark's property, including the interest in Edwin's estate, to Dillard and Alice. Eliza appealed the trial court's decision on the ground that the interest in Edwin's estate was community property subject to her spousal share.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crail, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.