Estate of Cook v. United States

86-2 U.S.T.C. ¶ 13,678 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Cook v. United States

United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
86-2 U.S.T.C. ¶ 13,678 (1986)

JC

Facts

Howard Winston Cook (plaintiff) was one of the main owners of Central Bancompany, Inc., a Missouri banking institution. On December 24, 1976, Cook transferred 1,725 shares of common stock of Central Bancompany, Inc., to an irrevocable trust, of which his children were the beneficiaries. In 1977, Cook filed a gift-tax return, which indicated a gift-tax liability of $2,250. That figure was based on a valuation of $40 per share of the stock in question. Cook died on May 8, 1978, and in 1982, the government (defendant) sent his estate a notice of gift-tax deficiency for $84,063, based on a valuation of $257 per share. The estate paid that assessment and then filed a claim for refund. Both the estate and the government presented expert opinions on the value of the stock, but the court found neither to be persuasive and thus engaged in its own valuation. In December 1976, Central Bancompany was the seventh largest bank holding company in Missouri and controlled the dominant bank in central Missouri. In 1976, Central Bancompany had $421 million assets and $41 million in stockholder equity. Its shares had a book value of $211.38, with a net income per share of $18.54 and dividends of $1.80 per share. While shares of the company had sold between 1973 and 1982 for prices ranging from $36 per share to $68.18 per share, the court noted that the sales were sporadic and that Central Bancompany owners and managers set those prices. The court noted that among publicly traded Missouri bank holding companies, the bid price to book value ratios ranged from 51 to 92 percent, while the $40 valuation would place Central Bancompany at 19 percent. In order to be comparable to the average publicly traded Missouri bank holding company, the stock would have to sell for $141.62 per share. Similarly, the price-to-earnings ratio for Central Bancompany was well below that of the average publicly traded Missouri bank holding company. To be comparable to the average of that group, the stock would have to sell for $122.36 per share. Data for share price based on divided yield likewise suggested similar results.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bartlett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership