Estate of D'Ambrosio v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
101 F.3d 309 (1996)
Rose D’Ambrosio owned a block of stock worth approximately $2.35 million. At age 80, D’Ambrosio retained a life interest in the stock, i.e., a right to receive income from the stock for the rest of her life, but sold the stock’s remainder interest, i.e., the right to own the stock after she died. In exchange for the remainder interest, D’Ambrosio received an annuity that would make payments to her until she died. This annuity was worth approximately $1.32 million, which was the fair market value of the stock block’s remainder interest. When D’Ambrosio died, the commissioner of Internal Revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that, under 26 U.S.C. § 2036(a), the stock’s remainder interest was like a testamentary gift that depleted the gross estate of the stock block’s full, fee-simple value at D’Ambrosio’s death. Because D’Ambrosio had not received the stock’s full, fee-simple value in exchange for that remainder interest, the commissioner believed that the gross estate ended up short of assets. To avoid this arguable shortfall in the gross estate, the commissioner included the full $2.35 million stock block in D’Ambrosio’s gross estate, deducted the amount of annuity payments D’Ambrosio had received for the stock, and assessed estate tax on the remaining amount. D’Ambrosio’s estate (plaintiff) petitioned the United States Tax Court for a determination that none of the stock was part of the gross estate because the only interest that still existed at D’Ambrosio’s death—the remainder interest—had been transferred during D’Ambrosio’s life for its fair market value. The Tax Court ruled that D’Ambrosio’s receipt of less than the stock’s full, fee-simple value meant that D’Ambrosio had not received adequate and full consideration and that the entire stock block was a taxable part of the gross estate. The estate appealed to the Third Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Nygaard, J.)
Dissent (Cowen, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.