Estate of Figueroa v. Williams
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
2010 WL 5387599 (2010)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Tyrone Williams (defendant) illegally smuggled Mexican and Honduran citizens into the United States in his tractor-trailer. Great Dane Trailer (Great Dane) (defendant) was a Delaware limited partnership that owned the trailer, and Salem Trucking, Inc. (Salem) (defendant) was a New York corporation that owned the tractor. Williams abandoned the trailer at a Texas gas station, resulting in 19 deaths. The families of the 19 decedents (collectively, families) (collectively, plaintiffs) sued Williams, Great Dane, and Salem in federal court in Texas for, among other things, wrongful death. The families all lived in Mexico or Honduras and had no other connections to Texas. Great Dane and Salem asked the court to apply the substantive law of Mexico and Honduras instead of Texas’s substantive law because Mexico and Honduras assertedly had the most significant relationships with the parties and the relevant occurrence. The families responded that Texas had the most significant relevant relationships. Mexican and Honduran substantive law differed from Texas law in that (1) Mexican and Honduran law did not recognize survival claims, which Texas law recognized; (2) Mexican and Honduran law computed compensatory damages in more formulaic and less plaintiff-friendly ways than Texas law; and (3) Mexican and Honduran law did not recognize punitive damages, which Texas law recognized.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rainey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.