Estate of Giannopoulos
New York Surrogate’s Court
392 N.Y.S.2d 828, 89 Misc. 2d 691 (1977)
- Written by Jose Espejo , JD
Facts
A New York law firm filed an application with the New York Surrogate’s Court on behalf of their client, Areti Giannopoulos (plaintiff), the widow of John Giannopoulos. Areti was a resident of Albania and seeking the right of election to take against John’s will. The law firm filed the power of attorney, allegedly executed by Areti in Albania, for recording with the clerk of the court. There were several issues with the filing. First, the power of attorney did not contain the grantor’s full address. Second, the law firm provided that the power of attorney was procured through a third party, but the affirmation did not explain who the third party was. Third, the power of attorney included language regarding attorney’s fees that was not listed in the power of attorney, without providing Areti’s agreement to or documentation of the arrangement. Fourth, the power of attorney included a deficient English language translation without an accompanying affidavit attesting to the translator’s qualifications and the accuracy of the translation. Finally, the required certificate of authentication accompanying the certificate of acknowledgment was not compliant with the New York real property statute. The power of attorney was accepted and recorded by the clerk of the court. Based on the power of attorney, the law firm sought to have the court entertain an application regarding the Areti’s alleged right of election to take against John’s will.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Laurino, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.