Estate of Kincaid v. Commissioner

85 T.C. 25 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Kincaid v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
85 T.C. 25 (1985)

JC

Facts

Garvice Kincaid died in 1975. In Garvice’s estate, he provided for payment of debts, taxes, and expenses and then directed that the remainder be divided into two parts, a marital and nonmarital part. The marital part was to include the maximum property value in Garvice’s gross estate that qualified for the marital deduction. This marital portion included Garvice’s right to future bonus payments under an employment contract from Kentucky Finance Company. The nonmarital part was the remaining property. Garvice’s wife, Nelle Kincaid, received over $150,000 in 1976 and over $230,000 in 1977 from Kentucky Finance Company. Nelle did not report those sums on her income taxes but subsequently agreed that those payments were income in respect of a decedent (IRD) and includable in Nelle’s gross income. The question became how much of a deduction Nelle should be allowed. All parties concurred on the first part of the calculation—Nelle’s IRD divided by all such IRD sums from Garvice’s estate—but the concern was how to figure out the second part of the equation, which was the amount of estate tax attributable to Nelle’s IRD funds from Kentucky Finance Company. Nelle’s estate (plaintiff) (Nelle had died during the pendency of this suit) argued that the IRD payments should be evenly divided between marital and nonmarital parts of the estate to calculate the estate tax allocable to those amounts. The government (defendant) disagreed, arguing that the amounts should be subtracted wholly from the marital deduction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Clapp, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership