Estate of Lumpkin v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
474 F.2d 1092 (1973)
- Written by Tom Squier, JD
Facts
James H. Lumpkin, Jr., was insured through his employer, which provided a group term life-insurance policy for all its employees. The employer dictated that the beneficiaries of the life-insurance policy were an employee’s surviving spouse, minor children, or parents, in that order. Lumpkin could not change the beneficiaries. Lumpkin could, however, defer distributions of the life-insurance proceeds, or otherwise negotiate the timing of distributions with the employer and insurance provider. After Lumpkin’s death, Lumpkin’s estate (plaintiff) did not include the proceeds of the life-insurance policy in Lumpkin’s gross estate when filing the estate-tax return. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that the estate was deficient for estate taxes because it should have included the proceeds of the life-insurance policy. The estate petitioned for a redetermination of the taxes with the United States Tax Court, and that court found that the life-insurance proceeds did not need to be included in the gross estate. The IRS appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gewin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.