Estate of Mann

184 Cal. App. 3d 593 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Mann

California Court of Appeal
184 Cal. App. 3d 593 (1986)

Facts

Hazel Mann had good relationships with two nephews, Roy Smith (plaintiff) and Norman Van Gorp (defendant). Mann was especially close with Smith. Mann began experiencing symptoms of senile dementia, including having trouble taking care of herself and occasionally forgetting people or important life events, such as a sister’s death. At the recommendation of Mann’s doctor, Dr. Lee, Smith became Mann’s legal conservator to help care for Mann. However, Mann still had some good moments, and her accountant believed she had a good grasp of her financial situation during that time period. A year later, Mann wanted to make a will. An attorney, Lee, and Mann’s housekeeper met with Mann to create the will. At that time, according to Lee, Mann did not yet have advanced dementia. All three witnesses believed that Mann was alert and knew that she was signing a will that day. In the will, Mann gave most of her estate to Smith. Mann died several years later. Van Gorp objected to Mann’s will, arguing that Mann’s dementia and the conservatorship meant that Mann had lacked the legal capacity to create a will. A jury found that Mann had lacked testamentary capacity. Smith appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kline, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership