Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Estate of Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center

137 F.3d 398 (1998)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

Estate of Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

137 F.3d 398 (1998)

Facts

William Mauro (plaintiff) was HIV-positive and employed by Borgess Medical Center (BMC) (defendant) as an operating room technician. BMC was anonymously informed that Mauro had “full blown” AIDS. BMC was concerned that Mauro might expose a patient to HIV and decided to create a new full-time position specifically for Mauro that eliminated all risks of HIV transmission. Mauro refused to accept the position. BMC then created a task force to determine whether an HIV-positive employee could safely perform the job duties of a surgical technician. The task force concluded that because the duties of a surgical technician routinely involve the placing of hands inside a patient’s body cavity in the presence of sharp instruments, an HIV-positive employee posed a direct threat to patient care and safety. BMC informed Mauro that he could no longer serve as a surgical technician and could either accept the newly-created position or be laid off. Mauro was unresponsive and BMC fired him. Mauro filed suit against BMC alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act (RA). BMC was granted summary judgment because the district court held that Mauro’s HIV-positive status posed a direct threat to the health and safety of others that could not be eliminated by reasonable accommodation. Mauro appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)

Dissent (Boggs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership