Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Estate of McCreath

Colorado Court of Appeals
240 P.3d 413 (2009)


Facts

Hazel McCreath created a revocable inter vivos trust; its assets consisted of the family farm and appurtenant mineral interests. Hazel designated herself and her daughter, Charlotte Ritchey (defendant), as co-trustees. The trust provided that Hazel could revoke it, in whole or in part, by signing and delivering a written instrument to the trustees. The trust further provided that both trustees were to make all trust decisions, unless the settlor had expressly given discretion to a single trustee. Almost 20 years after the trust was created, Hazel executed, alone, a quitclaim deed, conveying the family farm to Charlotte, free and clear of the trust. Several years later, Hazel executed a will consisting of four bulleted paragraphs. The first read: “revoke all prior wills and trusts.” The second divided Hazel’s personal property equally among Charlotte and Hazel’s two sons, Elton McCreath and Milford McCreath (the sons) (plaintiffs). The third paragraph distributed the residue of Hazel’s estate: 80 percent to Charlotte and 10 percent to each son. The fourth addressed the appointment of an executor. The will was delivered to Charlotte. Hazel died a year later. After Hazel’s death, the sons filed a lawsuit in a Colorado court, seeking a declaration of the effect of the quitclaim deed and the will, and pressing claims against Charlotte for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, civil theft, an accounting, and constructive trust. The trial court ruled that the trust was not revoked by the quitclaim deed or the will. Charlotte appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Roy, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.