Estate of Meade v. Commissioner

489 F.2d 161 (1974)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Meade v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
489 F.2d 161 (1974)

Facts

Joseph Meade and William King (taxpayers) were sole shareholders of Terrace Corporation, which was liquidated. The corporation distributed its assets proportionally to Meade and King, including an antitrust-litigation claim. Because the claim’s value was uncertain, the claim was not included on tax returns at the time of the distribution, and the liquidation remained an open transaction. Meade and King hired attorneys to pursue this claim, which was later settled. The settlement proceeds were reported as capital gains pursuant to the liquidation of the corporation. However, the amounts paid for legal fees and litigation expenses were deducted against ordinary income as expenses incurred for collection of income under § 212 of the Internal Revenue Code. The commissioner of Internal Revenue (defendant) disallowed the deductions and instead applied the expenses as an offset against the capital gains of the settlement proceeds because the expenses were incurred in disposition of a capital asset under § 263. Meade and King petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination. The Tax Court ruled for Meade and King, and the matter ended up before the Fifth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ainsworth, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership