Estate of Mitchell

91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 192 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Mitchell

California Court of Appeal
91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 192 (1999)

RW

Facts

Robert Mitchell and his wife, Shirley Mitchell (defendant), acquired property as joint tenants. After Shirley filed for divorce, the divorce court issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining Robert from taking any action to transfer or dispose of the jointly held property in any way. Despite the TRO, Robert attempted to sever the joint tenancy and convey any interest in the property to himself. Robert died while the divorce proceeding was still pending. Robert’s son and the administrator of his estate, Charles Jeffrey Mitchell (plaintiff), instituted a probate proceeding and asserted that the property passed to Robert’s estate upon his death. Shirley petitioned the probate court to award her the property, contending that Robert’s severance of the joint tenancy was invalid because it violated the divorce court’s TRO. The probate court granted Shirley’s petition, and Charles appealed to the California Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Richli, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership