Estate of Mitchell v. Commissioner

250 F.3d 696 (2001)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Mitchell v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
250 F.3d 696 (2001)

Facts

Paul Mitchell owned 49.04 percent of John Paul Mitchell Systems (JPMS) when he died. Mitchell’s estate (plaintiff) filed an estate-tax return valuing the stock at $28.5 million. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) on audit calculated the value of the stock to be $105 million at the time of Mitchell’s death and issued the estate a notice of deficiency. Mitchell’s estate filed a petition with the United States Tax Court to challenge the IRS’s notice of deficiency. At trial, the IRS’s own experts established that the IRS’s initial valuation of $105 million for the stock was erroneously inflated by treating Mitchell as owning a controlling interest in JPMS. Mitchell’s estate filed a motion with the Tax Court seeking a ruling that the burden of proof had shifted to the IRS. The Tax Court denied the motion and conducted the trial as if neither party carried a burden of proof as to the amount of tax owed. Rather, the Tax Court weighed the evidence of both sides to find that the stock was properly valued at approximately $ 41.5 million. Among the issues the estate raised on appeal was the Tax Court’s denial of the estate’s motion as to the burden of proof.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wardlaw, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership