Estate of Pickard v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
60 T.C. 618 (1973)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Claire Pickard died and bequeathed her residuary estate to the Pickard Trust. Her stepfather, Herbert Peterson, had a vested remainder in the Pickard Trust. He died before Pickard, and his will left his residuary estate to the Peterson Trust, which indicated that a pair of tax-exempt organizations would receive the trust corpus after the death of certain family members. When Pickard’s estate (plaintiff) filed an estate-tax return, it claimed a charitable deduction for the amount of her estate that eventually passed to the Peterson Trust and would eventually be received by the two qualified charities. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) disallowed that deduction. There was no disagreement about the tax-exempt character of the two organizations and the amount of the deduction in question. The sole issue was whether the Pickard estate could claim the deduction. The tax regulation in question provided that in order to claim the deduction, (1) the decedent had to make a transfer, (2) the transfer had to be property includable in the gross estate, and 3) the transfer had to be for the use of a qualified Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) entity. The estate believed that the transfer in question satisfied the regulation, but the government disagreed with this interpretation, as Pickard had willed her estate merely to the Pickard Trust, not to the charitable entities herself.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.