Estate of Rapelje v. Commissioner

73 T.C. 82 (1979)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Rapelje v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
73 T.C. 82 (1979)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

In August 1969, Adrian Rapelje transferred title to his New York home to his two daughters, Helen Mulligan and Priscilla Wright (plaintiffs). In September, Mulligan’s niece moved into the house with her husband and stayed about five months while Rapelje went to Florida for the winter, as he had done annually for a decade. Rapelje looked at one Florida house for sale but did not house hunt extensively. After six months, Rapelje returned and resumed living alone in the New York house. In July 1970, a stroke left Rapelje partially paralyzed and unable to speak. A year later, Mulligan’s daughter moved in and stayed with Rapelje for several months. Otherwise, Rapelje lived alone in the house until his death in 1973. Meanwhile, his daughters did not try to sell or rent the house. One paid some utility bills, but Rapelje paid the property taxes and paid no rent. Mulligan claimed she had planned to move into the house by 1971 and made some weekend trips and repairs in preparation but abandoned that plan after Rapelje’s stroke. Rapelje’s will appointed his daughters coexecutrixes of his estate, and they had his final estate-tax return prepared. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) assessed a tax deficiency, reasoning that the estate included the house because Rapelje had retained possession and enjoyment. The daughters petitioned on the estate’s behalf, arguing Rapelje had given them the house.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership