Estate of Roy v. Commissioner

54 T.C. 1317 (1970)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Estate of Roy v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
54 T.C. 1317 (1970)

Facts

Dwight Roy and his brother transferred property to a trust. Roy and his brother granted their father a life estate in the income from the trust and each held a reversionary interest whereby the trust corpus would revert back to them if their father were to predecease them. If either Roy or his brother died before their father, the deceased son’s respective share in the trust corpus would be managed to benefit the deceased son’s family. Roy was 41 years old and in good health when he and his brother formed the trust. However, Roy was later discovered to have a severe kidney disease, to which he succumbed at the age of 47. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) used mortality tables that compared Roy’s age at his death with the ages of his brother and father to value Roy’s reversion interest at 70 percent of the value of assets transferred to the trust. Roy’s estate (plaintiff) considered Roy’s actual life expectancy, taking his kidney disease into account, to value his reversionary interest at 5 percent of the value of the transferred assets. Roy’s estate filed a petition in tax court to determine the correct valuation method.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sterrett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership