Estate of Sels v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
82 T.C. 64 (1984)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a deficiency notice to the estate of Della Sells (estate) (plaintiff), claiming that the estate owed more than $2.4 million in estate tax. The estate and the estate’s coexecutors (plaintiffs) challenged the IRS’s determination by filing a petition against the IRS commissioner (defendant) with the United States Tax Court. The parties’ dispute involved the valuation of minority interests in certain timber property as of Sells’s death. Pursuant to Tax Court Rule 134 (now Rule 133), the estate and the coexecutors moved for a continuance of the scheduled trial date, citing the parties’ relatively recent exchange of expert reports regarding the valuation issue and claiming that they needed more time to consult with other experts and potential witnesses. The estate and coexecutors also noted that, due to other commitments, the parties’ respective appraisers could not yet provide current information about current timber volume, but the estate and coexecutors believed that such information would be available soon and that the parties could reach a stipulation about that issue. This was the estate and coexecutors’ first request for a continuance. The commissioner opposed a continuance.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hamblen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.