Estate of Sheldon
Court of Appeal of California
142 Cal. Rptr. 119 (1977)
Florence Sheldon and Al Sheldon were married in January of 1974. In 1972, Florence drafted a valid holographic will that directed the residue of her estate to be divided between her two children from another marriage, Oscar Marion Huffman (Marion) (plaintiff) and Helen Peterson. Florence passed away in September 1974. Al assigned his interest in Florence’s estate to Mr. and Mrs. Peterson (defendants). Marion filed a claim to determine heirship in Florence’s estate, and the Petersons filed a claim for both their share and Al’s share. Marion alleged that an oral antenuptial agreement existed between Al and Florence by which each party had agreed to waive his or her claim in the other’s estate, which barred the application of California Probate Code (Probate Code) section 220. The trial court, using an advisory jury, found that an oral antenuptial agreement existed and that Florence, by marrying Al, had changed her position to her detriment. The trial court held that because the agreement had been fully performed, the Petersons were estopped from raising the statute of frauds. The Petersons appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.