Estate of Smith v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
198 F.3d 515 (1999)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Algerine Smith leased land she owned to an oil company. The company was to pay Smith royalties equal to a set proportion of the price the oil company received for any oil or gas it extracted from the land. The royalty agreement further provided that the royalties would be adjusted if the government regulated the price of gas. The government did regulate the price of gas and later sued the oil company for setting prices above those permitted by regulations. A group of royalty owners, including Smith, began litigation concerning the effect of the government’s lawsuit on the oil company’s obligation under the royalty agreements. Shortly before Smith’s death, a judge in the pending litigation ruled that the oil company had a valid claim to sue the royalty owners for reimbursement of previously paid royalties based on oil sales prices in excess of those permitted by regulations. Smith died before these legal issues were fully resolved. At the time of Smith’s death, the oil company was seeking $2.48 million from Smith. Fifteen months after Smith’s death, her estate (plaintiff) and the oil company settled for approximately $680,000. The estate filed its estate tax return before the settlement was reached and included a deduction in the amount of $2.48 million. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined, after the settlement had been reached, that the estate was entitled to deduct only the $680,000 that the estate ultimately paid and issued a deficiency. The estate and the IRS jointly petitioned the tax court to resolve the dispute, and the tax court ruled in favor of the IRS. The estate appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiener, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.