Estate of Smith v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
103 Fed. Cl. 533 (2012)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
The Smith family owned the Atlanta Falcons through an S-corporation called Five Smiths, Inc. The equity of Five Smiths was split into Class A common stock, which had enhanced voting rights, and Class B common stock, which had ordinary voting rights. Rankin Smith owned only shares of Class A common stock. Other members of the Smith family owned the remaining Class A stock and all of the Class B stock. Two Smith family members sold some of their Class B common shares to nonfamily members. In conjunction with the sale, Five Smiths and all its shareholders entered into an agreement providing that all of Rankin’s Class A shares would convert into Class B shares upon his death. Immediately before Rankin’s death, the Smith family held 97.4 percent of the total votes of Five Smiths. Immediately after Rankin’s death, the family held 88 percent of the vote. Rankin’s estate (plaintiff) included the shares converted into Class B stock in the gross estate at their postconversion value, without the enhanced voting rights. The Internal Revenue Service (defendant) valued the shares in their preconversion, Class A state, taking into account the added value of the enhanced voting rights. The parties brought their dispute to the Federal Court of Claims to resolve the issue of whether the voting rights lapsed before or after Rankin’s death for the purposes of valuing his gross estate.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Horn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.