Estate of Yaeger v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
889 F.2d 29 (1989)

- Written by Jessica Rice, JD
Facts
Louis Yaeger managed his own investment accounts from 1940 until his death as his full-time occupation. Yaeger grew his investment accounts by purchasing stock in undervalued companies and holding the stock until the company was profitable. Yaeger engaged in extensive research to determine what stock to purchase, often holding the stock for extended periods of time and offering his unsolicited advice to the companies to ensure his stock would be profitable. Yaeger also increased his profit by using margin debt to purchase more stock. On his 1979 and 1980 tax returns, Yaeger deducted his stock-interest expenses on his federal income-tax return. In 1979, 88 percent of the stock Yaeger sold had been held for over 12 months, and he never sold a stock he had held for less than three months. Similarly, in 1980, 91 percent of the stock Yaeger sold had been held for over 12 months, and he never sold a stock he had held for less than six months. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) (defendant) issued Yaeger a deficiency notice stating that the interest expenses Yaeger incurred when purchasing stock on margin were limitable by Internal Revenue Code § 163(d). Section 163(d) limits a noncorporate taxpayer’s ability to deduct investment interest to the amount of the taxpayer’s investment income plus $10,000. Yaeger, and later his estate (plaintiff), appealed to the United States Tax Court. The tax court upheld the commissioner’s finding that Yaeger was a noncorporate investor, and Yaeger appealed again.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mishler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.