Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center
Ohio Supreme Court
673 N.E.2d 1311 (1997)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Matt Morgan was diagnosed with schizophreniform disorder and suffered from paranoia and anger. Morgan’s doctor in Philadelphia prescribed medications to treat Morgan’s symptoms. When the symptoms subsided, Morgan moved to Ohio to live with his parents. In Ohio, Matt was treated as an outpatient by the Fairfield Family Counseling Center (FFCC) (defendant). FFCC staff took Morgan off of his medications. After that, Morgan began experiencing violent outbursts and put a deposit down on a gun. Morgan’s mother informed FFCC of these facts and that Morgan’s condition was deteriorating. Morgan’s mother asked FFCC to involuntarily hospitalize Morgan based on his change in behavior. After evaluating Morgan, FFCC chose not to involuntarily hospitalize him. Subsequently, Morgan killed his parents. The Estates of Morgan (estates) (plaintiff) brought suit against FFCC, claiming that FFCC breached its duty to control the violent acts of Morgan. The trial court granted FFCC’s motion for summary judgment. The estates appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Resnick, J.)
Dissent (Stratton, J.)
Dissent (Cook, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.