Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Estelle v. Smith

451 U.S. 454, 101 S. Ct. 1866, 68 L. Ed. 2d 359 (1981)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

Estelle v. Smith

United States Supreme Court

451 U.S. 454, 101 S. Ct. 1866, 68 L. Ed. 2d 359 (1981)

Facts

Ernest Benjamin Smith (defendant) was convicted of murder after a store clerk was killed by his accomplice during an armed robbery. Before his trial and after the state gave notice of its intent to seek the death penalty, the judge informally ordered that Smith be examined by a state psychiatrist to determine his competency to stand trial. After examining Smith, without the presence of Smith’s counsel, the psychiatrist concluded that Smith was competent to stand trial. The state did not give notice of its intent to use the psychiatrist’s testimony during any proceeding against Smith. However, the state called the psychiatrist during Smith’s penalty phase to testify regarding Smith’s future dangerousness, a prerequisite for imposing the death penalty. The testimony was allowed over Smith’s objection, and the jury determined that Smith met the requirements for a mandatory death sentence. Smith unsuccessfully sought a writ of habeas corpus in state court, so he petitioned a United States district court for relief. The district court vacated Smith’s sentence, finding that the state’s psychiatric evidence violated Smith’s right to remain silent and his right to counsel. A court of appeals affirmed the district court, and Smith requested certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership