Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Estin v. Estin

United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 541 (1948)


Facts

In 1942, Mr. Estin (defendant) left Mrs. Estin (plaintiff). The couple had been living together in New York since their marriage in 1937. In 1943, Mrs. Estin filed a separation action against Mr. Estin, who entered an appearance in the suit. The court found that Mr. Estin had abandoned his wife, granted a separation, and awarded her $180 per month in permanent alimony. In 1944, Mr. Estin moved to Nevada where he filed for divorce from Mrs. Estin in 1945. Mrs. Estin received notice of the action only through constructive service. She did not enter an appearance. In May 1945, a Nevada court found that Mr. Estin had satisfied Nevada’s residency requirement and granted a divorce. The Nevada court, which had been notified of the New York alimony award, did not provide for alimony in its decree. Mr. Estin had been making alimony payments to Mrs. Estin since the issuance of the New York award. He stopped when the divorce was granted. Mrs. Estin sued him in a New York court for payment in arrears. Mr. Estin moved to have the alimony award stricken from the New York separation decree on account of the Nevada divorce decree. The New York court denied his motion and awarded payment to Mrs. Estin. The Court of Appeals of New York affirmed. Mr. Estin petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Douglas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Jackson, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.