Evans v. Jeff D.
United States Supreme Court
475 U.S. 717 (1986)
Jeff D. (plaintiff), representing a class of emotionally and mentally handicapped children, sued Evans, the governor of Idaho (Idaho) (defendant) seeking injunctive relief to improve the treatment of institutionalized class members. The representation agreement between the class and the class’s attorney, a member of the Idaho legal aid society, contained no provision regarding attorney’s fees. Prior to trial, Idaho proposed a settlement which granted most of the sought-after injunctive relief but specifically excluded attorney’s fees from the settlement. The district court approved the settlement, and the Idaho Legal Aid Society, who represented Jeff D. et. al., appealed. The court of appeals affirmed, and the Idaho Legal Aid Society petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 160,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.