Evans v. UDR, Inc.

644 F. Supp. 2d 675 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Evans v. UDR, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
644 F. Supp. 2d 675 (2009)

Facts

East Coast Solutions, Inc. (East Coast) operated a substance-abuse program called the SEARISE Program (program). As part of the program, East Coast rented a group of apartments at Forest Hills Apartment Homes (Forest Hills). UDR, Inc. (defendant) owned Forest Hills. Robin Evans (plaintiff) sought to participate in the program. Evans was diagnosed with mental disabilities and was recovering from substance abuse. In order to participate in the program, Evans needed to qualify as a tenant at Forest Hills. On her rental application, Evans disclosed that she had a criminal conviction for assault. But UDR had a policy that prohibited renting to a prospective tenant with a criminal conviction. UDR thus refused to accept Evans as a tenant. Later, East Coast submitted an accommodation request to UDR, requesting that UDR allow Evans to reside at Forest Hills despite her criminal conviction. There was evidence indicating that Evans’s criminal conviction was directly related to her mental disabilities. Nonetheless, UDR denied the request for accommodation. Subsequently, Evans brought suit, contending that UDR violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA). UDR filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court took the motion under advisement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flanagan, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership