EverBank v. Marini
Vermont Supreme Court
134 A. 3d 189 (2015)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Caroline and Gary Marini (defendants) purchased a home in 2005. In 2009, Gary sought to take an additional loan against the home, but Caroline was opposed to the idea. Gary applied for the loan through LendingTree Loans, which required both Gary and Caroline to sign the mortgage. Caroline initially refused to sign the documents. Gary became extremely angry, berated Caroline in front of two of their children, and waved around a pair of large scissors. Caroline felt threatened and agreed to sign the documents. The next night, a notary came to the Marini home and witnessed Caroline’s signature on the mortgage documents. In 2011, the Marinis stopped making payments on the mortgage. The loan was assigned to Bank of America, which initiated foreclosure proceedings in late 2012. Subsequently, Bank of America assigned the loan to EverBank (plaintiff), which was substituted into the litigation. Caroline alleged that the mortgage was void as to her because she signed the documents under duress and filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, and EverBank appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Eaton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.