Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. Milstead
Court of Appeals of Maryland
112 A.2d 901 (1955)
Harold D. Milstead (plaintiff), a contractor, entered a contract with Evergreen Amusement Corp. (Evergreen) (defendant) for the clearing and grading of land on which Evergreen planned to open a drive-in movie theater. Milstead’s work was delayed, resulting in the theater opening for business over two months behind schedule. Milstead brought suit against Evergreen to recover full payment for his services. Evergreen counterclaimed, seeking to recover lost profits attributable to Milstead’s delay. At trial, the court refused to allow Evergreen to introduce witness testimony regarding its lost profits. Evergreen was found liable for the value of Milstead’s services.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hammond, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.