Eves v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Lower Gwynedd Township

401 Pa. 211, 164 A.2d 7 (1960)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Eves v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Lower Gwynedd Township

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
401 Pa. 211, 164 A.2d 7 (1960)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

In 1958, Lower Gwynedd Township adopted Ordinance 28, which amended the general zoning ordinance to provide for a new F-1 limited industrial zoning district. The ordinance set forth the requirements, conditions, and restrictive uses for an F-1 classification. The ordinance imposed physical requirements for use of land and reserved the right of the board of supervisors to prescribe particular requirements or reasonable conditions deemed appropriate concerning the suitability of the district in the neighborhood. Ordinance 28 did not delineate boundaries of the areas classified as F-1 districts but permitted anyone to apply to request that their land be rezoned to F-1. Applicants were required to show the nature of the industry they wished to establish and that any proposed construction conformed with the ordinance requirements. Applications required approval from the planning commission and the board of supervisors after a public hearing. Moore Construction Company (Moore) submitted such an application and sought to rezone their land from residential to F-1 to construct an industrial plant and sewage-treatment center. A public hearing on the application was held. A petition signed by 300 property-owning residents who opposed the zoning change was filed. The supervisors nevertheless adopted Ordinance 34, which granted Moore’s application to rezone its land. Township resident Schuyler Eves (plaintiff) appealed to the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Lower Gwynedd Township (defendant) and challenged the validity of Ordinances 28 and 34 on the grounds that they were unconstitutional and did not conform to the enabling legislation. The board dismissed Eves’s appeal, and the district court affirmed. Eves appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership