Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Ex-Cell-O Corporation

National Labor Relations Board
185 N.L.R.B. 107 (1970)


Facts

In 1964, the United Automobile Workers union won an election to represent employees of Ex-Cell-O Corporation (defendant). Over the company’s objections, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (plaintiff) certified the union as bargaining agent the following year. The company had bargaining agreements covering other plants but refused to bargain with the union, as a way to obtain judicial review of the certification decision. In 1967, the NLRB trial examiner found the refusal to bargain violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and recommended compensating employees for monetary losses suffered as a result, known as a “make-whole” remedy. The NLRB granted review and consolidated the case with three others involving extensive briefing and oral argument, delaying its decision until 1970—some five and a half years after it originally certified the union.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

Dissent (McCulloch and Brown, Members)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial