Ex parte Devine
Alabama Supreme Court
398 So. 2d 686 (1981)
Alice Beth Clark Devine (defendant) and Christopher Devine (plaintiff) were married in 1966, had two children, and subsequently separated in 1979. Both Alice and Christopher held jobs outside the home. At the time of Alice and Christopher’s separation, both children were less than seven years old and were thus considered to fall under the tender-years legal presumption. The trial court relied upon the tender-years presumption, which requires courts to award custody of young children to the mother if the parents are equally fit, and awarded Alice custody of the Devines’ two young children, subject to Christopher’s liberal visitation rights. Christopher ultimately appealed to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Maddox, J.)
Dissent (Torbert, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.