Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Ex Parte Heigho

Idaho Supreme Court
110 P. 1029 (1910)


Facts

Upon hearing that J.W. Barton may have made disparaging remarks about him, Edgar M. Heigho (defendant) and one of Barton’s employees, Frank Miller, went to Barton’s residence and rang the doorbell. Inside the house, Barton’s mother-in-law, Sylvia Riegleman, told Barton not to open the door because Heigho had a gun. Barton opened the front door and stepped out onto the front porch. When asked by Heigho whether Barton had made the remarks about him, Barton asserted that he had not told anything that was not true or well known in the community. Heigho then punched Barton in the face. Barton responded by hitting Heigho. Barton’s wife separated the two and ordered Heigho and Miller off their property. Meanwhile, Riegleman was at the front door crying, telling Barton that Heigho was going to kill him. Riegleman fell to her feet, clutched the porch banister, and was unable to get up. Riegleman died shortly thereafter. Heigho was charged with manslaughter in causing the death of Riegleman by fright or terror. A physician conducted an autopsy of Riegleman and noted that she suffered an aneurism which ruptured, causing her death. Heigho petitioned the Idaho Supreme Court to dismiss the manslaughter charge.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ailshie, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.