Ex parte Levitt
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 633 (1937)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
While Hugo Black (defendant) was a United States senator, Congress passed a law permitting United States Supreme Court judges to receive a full pension upon retirement. Subsequently, Black was appointed to the Supreme Court. Albert Levitt (plaintiff) filed a motion with the United States Supreme Court, seeking a show-cause order requiring Black to explain how his appointment did not violate Article I, Section 6, of the Constitution, which prohibited a congressman from being appointed to any civil office for which Congress increased the pay while the congressman was in office. Levitt was a United States citizen and a member of the bar but otherwise did not provide evidence of how he was harmed by Black’s conduct.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.