Ex Parte McCardle
United States Supreme Court
74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506 (1868)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
William McCardle (defendant), a newspaper editor in Vicksburg, Mississippi, was arrested by federal-government officials after he wrote a series of newspaper articles that were highly critical of the post-Civil War Reconstruction and resulting military rule of the South. The federal government justified McCardle’s arrest on the ground that he violated several provisions of the Reconstruction Acts. McCardle sought a writ of habeas corpus from a federal court in Mississippi but was ultimately unsuccessful in challenging his arrest. McCardle then sought appellate review of his habeas corpus petition in the United States Supreme Court, relying on an 1867 congressional statute that permitted the Supreme Court to have appellate jurisdiction over such matters. However, while the case was pending in the Supreme Court, Congress passed a new law repealing the part of the 1867 statute that permitted Supreme Court appellate review of writs of habeas corpus. President Andrew Johnson vetoed this legislation, but Congress immediately overrode his veto and reinstated its repeal of the 1867 statute.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chase, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
