Execu-Tech Business Systems, Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co., Ltd.
Florida Supreme Court
752 So. 2d 582 (2000)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
New Oji Paper Company, Ltd. (New Oji) (defendant), a Japanese corporation, was a thermal fax paper (TFP) manufacturer. TFP manufacturers sold bulk rolls to converters, who then repackaged the bulk rolls into smaller rolls suitable for retail or wholesale. New Oji sold its TFP to converters in Japan, who then sold it to wholesalers in the United States. In that way, New Oji became one of the leading producers of TFP sold in the United States. After a federal investigation, eight TFP manufacturers, including New Oji, pleaded guilty to implementing a wholesale price-fixing scheme that artificially increased TFP prices throughout the United States. Execu-Tech Business Systems, Inc. (Execu-Tech) (plaintiff), a Florida corporation, sued New Oji under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (DTP Act) for damages Execu-Tech suffered because of artificially inflated TFP retail prices. New Oji moved to dismiss, arguing that Florida could not exercise personal jurisdiction over New Oji because (1) New Oji was a Japanese corporation that only sold its TFP rolls within Japan; (2) New Oji did not have offices in Florida; and (3) Execu-Tech could not prove that New Oji’s TFP was sold in Florida during the relevant period. The trial court agreed and dismissed Execu-Tech’s claim. On appeal, the appellate court affirmed. Execu-Tech appealed to the Florida Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shaw, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.