Executive Excellence, LLC v. Martin Brothers Investments, LLC
Georgia Court of Appeals
710 S.E.2d 169 (2011)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
In December 2006, Richard F. Fritts, acting on behalf of Executive Excellence, LLC and another firm (sellers) (defendants) contracted with Martin Brothers Investments, LLC and another firm (buyers) (plaintiffs) for the sale and purchase of two tracts of land, contingent on the buyers persuading local governments to rezone the property by April 1, 2007. The sellers rescinded the contracts when the deadline passed without action on the buyers' rezoning applications. In late April and mid-May 2007, the buyers or their agents told third parties that they intended to pursue rezoning and enforce the contracts, and that the tracts were actively involved in litigation that was intended to "teach [Fritts] a lesson," and which could take years to settle. The buyers sued the sellers and filed lis pendens notices at the end of May 2007. In October 2007, an agent for the buyers told third parties that the buyers could keep the tracts in litigation for the next five to ten years. The buyers later dropped their claims, without prejudice, but they did not remove the lis pendens. The sellers filed a counterclaim, alleging that the buyers slandered the sellers' title by wrongfully filing and maintaining lis pendens on the tracts, and by making false and malicious statements regarding the property dispute. The trial court dismissed the sellers' claim, and they appealed to the Georgia Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McFadden, J.)
Dissent (Miller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.