Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
2019 WL 1596822 (2019)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Exmark Manufacturing Company (Exmark) (plaintiff) won a patent-infringement lawsuit against Briggs & Stratton Corporation (defendant). The trial court found for Exmark and ordered Briggs & Stratton to pay prejudgment interest on royalty payments it owed to Exmark. While that prejudgment interest was accruing, the United States Treasury rate (the Treasury rate) was almost zero percent, but borrower interest rates, including the prime rate, were much higher. Briggs argued that the court should apply the Treasury rate to all of Exmark’s damages. Exmark argued that the Treasury rate should be applied for the period before the lawsuit was filed, and the prime rate should be applied for the period between filing and the issuance of the judgment. In support of its argument, Exmark presented evidence that its cost of borrowing at all times relevant to the case had been higher than both the treasury rate and the prime rate. The district court considered which interest rate to apply.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Baitailon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.