Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. v. The Liquidating Trust
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado
313 B.R. 473 (2004)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (Expeditors) (defendant) was granted a security interest in all property owned by Schwinn Cycling and Fitness, Inc. (Schwinn) (plaintiff) that was under Expeditors’ possession or control. On July 16, 2001, Schwinn filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code). During the weeks before Schwinn’s filing, Expeditors had some of Schwinn’s goods in its possession, which Expeditors returned to Schwinn and which Schwinn then sold. Under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 9-313(a), Expeditors held an automatically perfected security interest through its possession of the goods. However, Expeditors failed to file a financing statement in connection with the goods within 20 days after returning the goods to Schwinn. Thereafter, Schwinn deposited the proceeds from the sale of the goods into a segregated cash-collateral fund. Expeditors claimed an interest in the fund based on its initial interest perfected by possession, arguing that Schwinn’s bankruptcy filing had converted Expeditors’ temporary 20-day interest into a permanent interest, which did not require the second type of perfection by either filing or possession ordinarily required by UCC § 9-312(h) in order to maintain perfection after expiration of the 20-day period.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nottingham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.