Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Exterior Systems, Inc. v. Noble Composites, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
175 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (2001)


In 1972, Edward Welter (defendant) founded Fabwel, Inc. (Fabwel) (defendant). Law firm Warrick & Boyn (W&B) served as counsel for Fabwel. Cynthia Gillard, an attorney at W&B, represented Fabwel in its purchase of a company owned by Larry Farver (defendant). Gillard prepared acquisition documents on behalf of Fabwel, including non-competition and non-disclosure agreements with Welter and Farver. In 1985, Welter created a benefit plan for executives at Fabwel. Gillard later drafted an amended benefit plan, which completely replaced the 1985 plan. Gillard continued to represent Fabwel in various transactions, including Fabwel’s initial public offering and purchase of other companies. In 1997, Welter sold Fabwel to Fibreboard Corporation (Fibreboard). As part of the sale, Welter and Fabwel signed an amendment to the benefit plan. Gillard represented Welter during the transaction. A new company then bought Fibreboard and merged Fabwel into Exterior Systems, Inc. (ESI) (plaintiff). In 2000, Farver resigned from ESI and formed Noble Composites, Inc. (Noble) (defendant) with several former Fabwel employees, including Welter. ESI terminated the benefit plan and ceased paying Welter. In 2001, ESI brought suit against Noble, Farver, and Welter, alleging breach of the non-competition and non-disclosure agreements. The defendants counterclaimed, alleging that ESI breached the agreements. Gillard represented Welter in the lawsuit. ESI filed a motion to disqualify Gillard as counsel for Welter.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Nuechterlein, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.