Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Exterior Systems, Inc. v. Noble Composites, Inc.

175 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (2001)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,800+ case briefs...

Exterior Systems, Inc. v. Noble Composites, Inc.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

175 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (2001)

Facts

In 1972, Edward Welter (defendant) founded Fabwel, Inc. (Fabwel) (defendant). Law firm Warrick & Boyn (W&B) served as counsel for Fabwel. Cynthia Gillard, an attorney at W&B, represented Fabwel in its purchase of a company owned by Larry Farver (defendant). Gillard prepared acquisition documents on behalf of Fabwel, including non-competition and non-disclosure agreements with Welter and Farver. In 1985, Welter created a benefit plan for executives at Fabwel. Gillard later drafted an amended benefit plan, which completely replaced the 1985 plan. Gillard continued to represent Fabwel in various transactions, including Fabwel’s initial public offering and purchase of other companies. In 1997, Welter sold Fabwel to Fibreboard Corporation (Fibreboard). As part of the sale, Welter and Fabwel signed an amendment to the benefit plan. Gillard represented Welter during the transaction. A new company then bought Fibreboard and merged Fabwel into Exterior Systems, Inc. (ESI) (plaintiff). In 2000, Farver resigned from ESI and formed Noble Composites, Inc. (Noble) (defendant) with several former Fabwel employees, including Welter. ESI terminated the benefit plan and ceased paying Welter. In 2001, ESI brought suit against Noble, Farver, and Welter, alleging breach of the non-competition and non-disclosure agreements. The defendants counterclaimed, alleging that ESI breached the agreements. Gillard represented Welter in the lawsuit. ESI filed a motion to disqualify Gillard as counsel for Welter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nuechterlein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership