Exterior Systems, Inc. v. Noble Composites, Inc.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
175 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (2001)
- Written by Casey Cohen, JD
Facts
In 1972, Edward Welter (defendant) founded Fabwel, Inc. (Fabwel) (defendant). Law firm Warrick & Boyn (W&B) served as counsel for Fabwel. Cynthia Gillard, an attorney at W&B, represented Fabwel in its purchase of a company owned by Larry Farver (defendant). Gillard prepared acquisition documents on behalf of Fabwel, including non-competition and non-disclosure agreements with Welter and Farver. In 1985, Welter created a benefit plan for executives at Fabwel. Gillard later drafted an amended benefit plan, which completely replaced the 1985 plan. Gillard continued to represent Fabwel in various transactions, including Fabwel’s initial public offering and purchase of other companies. In 1997, Welter sold Fabwel to Fibreboard Corporation (Fibreboard). As part of the sale, Welter and Fabwel signed an amendment to the benefit plan. Gillard represented Welter during the transaction. A new company then bought Fibreboard and merged Fabwel into Exterior Systems, Inc. (ESI) (plaintiff). In 2000, Farver resigned from ESI and formed Noble Composites, Inc. (Noble) (defendant) with several former Fabwel employees, including Welter. ESI terminated the benefit plan and ceased paying Welter. In 2001, ESI brought suit against Noble, Farver, and Welter, alleging breach of the non-competition and non-disclosure agreements. The defendants counterclaimed, alleging that ESI breached the agreements. Gillard represented Welter in the lawsuit. ESI filed a motion to disqualify Gillard as counsel for Welter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nuechterlein, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.