Eyerman v. Mercantile Trust Co.

524 S.W.2d 210 (1975)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Eyerman v. Mercantile Trust Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals
524 S.W.2d 210 (1975)

SC
Play video

Facts

Louise Woodruff Johnston’s will directed the executor to raze Johnston’s house and sell the land it was on with the proceeds going to her beneficiaries. The house was part of the Kingsbury Place subdivision in St. Louis, which is a city landmark due to its architectural significance. Neighboring property owners and trustees of the subdivision where Johnston’s house was located (plaintiffs) filed for an injunction to stop the destruction of the house, claiming among other things that it would diminish their property values and would be against public policy. At trial it was learned that destroying the house—worth $40,000 as it stood—would provide a net of only $650 to Johnston’s beneficiaries. Nevertheless, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ petition for injunction. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rendlen, J.)

Dissent (Clemens, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership