Eze v. Yellow Cab Co. of Alexandria, Virginia, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
782 F.2d 1064 (1986)
![DM](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/7/Denise_McGimsey.webp)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Eze and one or more other persons (plaintiffs), all citizens of Nigeria, were injured while riding in a cab owned by the Yellow Cab Co. of Alexandria, Virginia, Inc. (Yellow Cab) (defendant) and driven by Godwin Sam Akakpo (defendant). The plaintiffs sued the defendants for personal injury in federal district court, alleging diversity of citizenship as the basis for jurisdiction. The plaintiffs’ complaint did not specify Akakpo’s citizenship. On that basis, Yellow Cab moved to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiffs did not respond to Yellow Cab’s motion or request an extension of time. The court dismissed the complaint. The plaintiffs appealed. At oral argument on appeal, the plaintiffs acknowledged that Akakpo was a citizen of Ghana.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.