F. Enterprises Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
47 Ohio St. 2d 154 (1976)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
F. Enterprises Inc. (plaintiff) entered into an option agreement to purchase a parcel of land. F. Enterprises then entered into an agreement with Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. (KFC) (defendant) to lease half of the parcel for $1,100 per month for 20 years. Under the agreement, F. Enterprises would either build a $40,000 building on the property or require KFC to do so, which F. Enterprises would reimburse up to $40,000. Prior to the exercise of the option, KFC notified F. Enterprises that it would not be entering into the lease agreement. F. Enterprises exercised the option and purchased the property anyway and then sued KFC, alleging breach of contract. The evidence showed that the rental market value of the property was $9,025 per year with the building constructed and $3,825 per year without the building constructed. The trial court awarded F. Enterprises approximately $28,500 in damages. This amount represented the difference between the contracted lease amount and the market value of the property with the building constructed, reduced by the interest income on the $40,000 that had not been expended on constructing the building, over 20 years and then discounted to present value. KFC appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stephenson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.