F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 228 (1952)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Contemporary Arts, Inc. (plaintiff) made small sculptures and figurines, including small statues of cocker spaniels. Contemporary Arts sold the statues to gift and art shops. Another person saw the cocker spaniel statues and copied the design. F.W. Woolworth (defendant) saw the counterfeit goods and decided to purchase them. F.W. Woolworth then offered the statues for sale. As a result, F.W. Woolworth became liable for copyright infringement as a marketer. F.W. Woolworth submitted its profit calculation, showing that a gross profit of approximately $900 was generated from the sale of the statues. The trial court awarded statutory damages in the amount of $5,000 and attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,000. F.W. Woolworth appealed, and the appellate court affirmed. F.W. Woolworth petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.