Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Faber v. Sweet Style Mfg. Corp.

40 Misc.2d 212, 242 N.Y.S.2d 763 (1963)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

Faber v. Sweet Style Mfg. Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, Nassau County

40 Misc.2d 212, 242 N.Y.S.2d 763 (1963)

Facts

On September 23, 1961, Faber (plaintiff) entered into a contract to purchase a plot of land from Sweet Style Manufacturing Corp. (SSMC) (defendant). Faber had been diagnosed with manic-depressive psychosis, and was in a manic phase from August to October 1961. On October 8, 1961, Faber was hospitalized in a mental institution. Before this time period, Faber was generally frugal and cautious, but between September 23 and October 8, 1961—the time between the contract signing and his hospitalization—Faber hired a title abstract company to perform a search on the plot of land, hired an employee to head the building project, had a sign built on the land stating that Faber Drug Company was coming soon, hired an architect, filed a mortgage application, hired laborers, and filed plans with City officials, among other things. Despite all this activity, closing was not to occur until October 20, 1961. Faber’s pre-trial examination revealed that he understood the contract, but did not explain the reasoning for his sudden change in behavior. His doctor testified that on September 23 he was “incapable of reasoned judgment.” SSMC’s expert psychiatrist testified that Faber’s judgment was intact on September 23. Faber brought suit to have the contract rescinded on account of his incompetence at the time he signed the contract.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Meyer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership