Fabric v. Commissioner

83 T.C. 932 (1984)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fabric v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
83 T.C. 932 (1984)

Facts

Five days before undergoing open-heart surgery in September 1975, Mollie Fabric set up an irrevocable trust for the benefit of her sons. The trust documents included an annuity agreement under which the trustee, Cayman National Bank, agreed to pay Fabric $2,378.48 per week for the rest of Fabric’s life, in consideration for which Fabric transferred assets totaling $1,150,000 into the trust. The annuity amount was calculated according to the gift-tax actuarial tables. Although Fabric’s physician estimated that Fabric had at least five years left to live as of late 1975, Fabric died in early 1977. The Internal Revenue Service commissioner (defendant) determined a deficiency on the ground that Fabric had retained a life estate in the transferred assets, thus subjecting that part of Fabric’s estate to the federal estate tax in accordance with Internal Revenue Code § 2036. The estate (plaintiff) challenged this determination in the United States Tax Court, arguing that the transfer had been a valid annuity agreement under which full and adequate consideration had been received, making the estate tax inapplicable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sterrett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership