Facenda v. N.F.L. Films, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
542 F.3d 1007 (2008)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
John Facenda was a well-known broadcaster who provided narration for National Football League Films, Inc. (NFL Films) (defendant). NFL Films owned the copyrights to recordings of Facenda’s voice, which had been used in NFL Films’s videos. Before his death in 1984, Facenda signed a release contract giving NFL Films perpetual use of Facenda’s voice recordings, “provided, however, such use does not constitute an endorsement of any product or service.” In 2005, NFL Films used Facenda’s voice recordings in a promotional video for a video game. The executor of Facenda’s estate (plaintiff) sued, arguing that NFL Films’s use of Facenda’s voice in the promotional video violated Facenda’s right of publicity. NFL Films argued that it owned the copyrights to Facenda’s voice recordings and that the copyright included the right to create derivative works based on those recordings. The district court granted summary judgment to Facenda’s estate. NFL Films appealed, arguing that the estate’s right-of-publicity claim was preempted by NFL Films’s right to make derivative works under federal copyright law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ambro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.