Fag og Arbejde (FOA) v. Kommunernes Landsforening

C-354/13, 18 December 2014 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fag og Arbejde (FOA) v. Kommunernes Landsforening

European Union Court of Justice
C-354/13, 18 December 2014 (2014)

KS

Facts

In November 1996, Karsten Kaltoft was hired by the municipality of Billund (defendant) in Denmark as a childcare provider. At Kaltoft’s hiring and throughout his employment, Kaltoft was obese. When Billund provided Kaltoft with opportunities to attend fitness and training sessions, Kaltoft lost and subsequently regained weight. In 2010, Kaltoft was visited multiple times by a supervisor who inquired about his weight. Concurrently, Kaltoft cared for three children, although he was approved to care for four. In late 2010, Kaltoft was dismissed from his position. During a meeting with supervisors on the day Kaltoft was dismissed, he asked why he was dismissed. In the follow-up discussion, Kaltoft’s obesity was mentioned; however, the meeting attendees disagreed about the context in which Kaltoft’s weight was mentioned and the role of Kaltoft’s obesity in his dismissal. Kaltoft was informed by letter that he was dismissed because of a decline in the number of children in his care. Fag og Arbejde, a Danish trade union, filed an action in the district court on behalf of Kaltoft (plaintiff), arguing that Kaltoft’s dismissal was discriminatorily based on his obesity, and Kaltoft should be compensated for the discrimination. In the suit, Billund was represented by the Kommunernes Landsforening, an organization of Denmark’s municipalities. The district court stayed its proceedings and referred multiple questions, including whether obesity is a disability covered by the Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (the directive), to the European Union Court of Justice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership