Faier v. Ambrose & Cushing, P.C.

609 N.E.2d 315 (1993)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Faier v. Ambrose & Cushing, P.C.

Illinois Supreme Court
609 N.E.2d 315 (1993)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

Martin Faier (defendant), an attorney, represented Recora Company (plaintiff), which had been sued for patent infringement. Faier filed a counterclaim on Recora’s behalf in the patent-infringement lawsuit and later introduced the president of Recora to attorney John Ambrose (defendant). Subsequently, Recora hired Ambrose to handle the entire counterclaim portion of the patent-infringement lawsuit. Due to Ambrose’s failure to comply with certain court orders, Recora’s counterclaim was dismissed. Recora then brought an action in trial court against Faier and Ambrose for legal malpractice. Faier filed his own counterclaim against Ambrose for contribution pursuant to the Illinois Contribution Act and for implied indemnity. Next, Faier settled the entire malpractice claim with Recora, and Recora released all claims against Faier and Ambrose. Ambrose did not participate in the settlement. Faier alleged that he paid more than his pro rata share of liability in the settlement with Recora and that his liability to Recora was wholly vicarious, arising out of the acts and omissions of Ambrose. Ambrose moved to dismiss Faier’s counterclaim. The trial court denied the motion but certified the issue for interlocutory appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heiple, J.)

Dissent (Harrison, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership